|
|
Camisetas Delph Baratas moncleroutletonline1495
h our ministers are subjected. It is quite true that the United States ministers cannot be responsible as are our ministers, seeing that the President himself is responsible, and that the Queen is not so. Indeed, according to the theory of the American Constitution, the President has no ministers. The Constitution speaks only of the principal officers of the executive departments. “He” (the President) “may require the opinion in writing of Goedkope Barcelona Voetbalshirts the principal officer in each of the executive departments.” But in practice he has his cabinet, and the irresponsibility of that cabinet would practically cease if the members Camisetas Pique Baratas of Ralph Lauren USA Homme Pas cher it were subjected to the questionings Peuterey Femme Nouveau Style Pas cher of the two Houses. With us the rule which prohibits servants of Camisetas Turan Baratas the State from going into Parliament is, like many of our constitutional rules, hard to be defined, and yet perfectly understood. It may perhaps be said, with the nearest approach Mont Blanc Pas cher to a correct definition, that permanent Goedkope Ierland Voetbalshirts servants of the State may not go into Parliament, and that those may do so whose services are political, Parajumpers Miehet Gobi depending for the duration of their term on the duration of the existing ministry. But even this would not be exact, seeing that the Master of the Rolls and the officers of the army and navy can sit in Parliament. The absence of the President’s ministers from Congress certainly occasions much confusion, or rather prohibits a more thorough political understanding between the executive and the legislature than now exists. In speaking of the government of the United States in the next chapter, I shall be constrained to allude again to this subject.*
* It will be Montblanc Greta Garbo Stylos Pas cher alleged by Americans that the introduction into Congress of the President’s ministers would alter all the existing relations of the President and of Congress, and would at once produce that parliamentary form of government which England possesses, and which the States have chosen to avoid. Such a change would elevate Congress and depress the President. No doubt this is true. Such elevation, however, and such deprlinks:
http://andrefranca.com/guestbook/
http://q.533.com.tw/viewthread.php?tid=1355864&pid=1631784&page=3&extra=page%3D1#pid1631784
http://disabledwww.533.com.tw/viewthread.php?tid=1392937&pid=1671705&page=1&extra=page%3D1#pid1671705 |
|
