標題: and DisplayPort 1.A pair of support. 57 [打印本頁] 作者: vddnweox 時間: 2016-3-8 11:52 標題: and DisplayPort 1.A pair of support. 57
New AMD Trinity APU information emerges
Basically know that Trinity APUs will be crafted pertaining to AMD's FM2 socket, it seems that the current A75 chipset might be compatible with the next gen choices. AMD's also talking up your 20 per cent performance boost, compared to its current Llano APUs. To the graphics front, there's also a professed performance boost of up to Thirty per cent.
What Trinity is also set to bring to the table, is definitely support for RAM hastens to DDR3 2,133MHz at voltage levels ranging from 1.25V around 1.5V.
Based on the chip car maker's Piledriver architecture, Trinity is said to serve right up third gen Turbo Central technology, AMD Eyefinity, and DisplayPort 1.Two support.
hmmmm. suspicious footnotes 20% CPU effectiveness increase over Llano is "Based about AMD projections using digital media channels workload". being that specific suggests that the typical Kamagra Australia CPU performance boost over Llano is going to be very small which will comes as little surprise gvein the distant relative performance of the 2 element FX 4100 (I assume that quad main here means 2 modules). Looks like AMD have decided that mainstream CPU performance simply doesn't involve improving for the next few ages which means they'll fall further behind Intel in Cpu terms, which Intel will be bound to use for promoting purposes. I'm not disagreeing together with AMD mind you for the vast majority of current day to day workloads a 2GHzish dual core is adequate although AMD are already behind in the promoting stakes and they could do without offering Intel any more ammunition. Apple company will try and sell more functionality than you need, AMD will try then sell more ghz than you will need. Take joe public plus he's more likely to go for a 4Ghz!!!!!!!!1!!One!!!!wow computer chip than the 2.9ghz but defeats AMD in the following benchmarks.
scaryjimhmmmm. cynical footnotes 20% CPU performance increase over Llano is "Based on AMD projections employing digital media workload". being that specific suggests that the general CPU operation boost over Llano is going to be very small which will comes as little delight gvein the relative performance with the 2 module FX 4100 (Perhaps that quad core here means 2 modules). Looks like AMD have decided that mainstream CPU effectiveness simply doesn't need improving for the few generations which means they'll fall even further behind Apple company in CPU terms, which usually Intel is then bound to apply for marketing purposes. As well as this the GPU is meant to often be 30% faster too. This is all done on the same 32NM process and I suspect the maximum TDP will not exceed 100W since the CPUs need to work in FM1 mother boards. That way you don't get a pointless GPU doing nothing like you have got with Intel's Sandy Bridge. It wouldn't be as "balanced" as AMD's marketing and advertising is banging on regarding but having a considerable benefit for gaming could be a excellent selling point when general software are not a worry.
