標題: T 34 [打印本頁] 作者: vldrryna 時間: 2016-3-6 11:56 標題: T 34
CINCINNATI Business leaders have heard repeatedly how technology can help all of them innovate. Now Greater Cincinnati nonprofit leaders will hear that information, too.
More than 150 charitable executives, fundraisers, board users and staff will obtain Tuesday for the 12 th 12-monthly Securing the Future conference, shown by the Cincinnati USA Regional Slot provided.
The event at Xavier University's Cintas Center will feature keynote speakers Randal Moss as well as Amy Sample Ward.
Moss will discuss techniques nonprofits can nurture entrepreneurial workforce and build on their own innovations. Keep will talk about ways that nonprofits can use technology to help change the planet.
Both speakers answered questions from WCPO Digital via contact to discuss how nonprofits can use technological know-how to better serve their clients and also supporters.
Q: What do nonprofits do right and what do they carry out wrong when it comes to how they utilize technology?
Moss: Nonprofit Organizations (NPOs) do not really use technology right or wrong but seem to primarily be right time to challenged. Historically, and for good cause, NPOs have been very intentional and even resistant to bringing on new technology into their practice until eventually that technology has been proven which is matured in its lifecycle. What is wrong with this approach is that by the time the particular NPOs can create strategies and tactics around the technology, the NPOs have forfeit a first mover advantage. Whilst it will mostcertainly deliver value if used properly, the thorough organizations lose years ofproductivitydue for their risk averse stance.
Keep: There are many nonprofits doing many things right. Some of the mistakes I see corporations make come from a fear that will adopting new technologies will mean using more staff time or else create "more work" to do. Instead, engineering like social media and e-mail promoting tools actually help institutions scale conversations and make marketing communications moreefficient.
Q: How could greater use of technology by nonprofits improve services for their clients?
Moss: Now there really are too many ways to label, and the benefits are only tied to the creativity of the NPO. Social service NPOs can use technologyto better suit and even predict client's requires for services. Technology can reduce cost of service supply and improve client results through more robust consumer recordmanagement(Customer relationship management) systems. NPOs candrasticallyincrease fundraising by experiencing technology based online communities. In the last decade digital communities include proliferated as neighborhood towns have deteriorated. Social networking technology can help constituents feel much more connected to the organization. Moreover the actual organizations can use technology equipment to more efficiently train employees and fundraisers. In the same way this NPOs can train their workers, they can also empower their fundraisers to more efficiently connect and have interaction their networks.
Ward: Also, there are the communications sections: more information that is more easily obtainable and accessible. This helps folks out about services initially and helps get more people that need to have your services connected to them. Opposed to this, there are the user experience sections: using data informatively to track purchasers and identify opportunities to serve them better, while also with all the data collectively to evaluate deliver and improve them for you.
Q: Should nonprofits be committing more in technology? Precisely why or why not?
Ward: This is usually a difficult question to answer within aggregate like this. Organizations have all different budgets, needs, present technology and training etc. Instead of saying that all nonprofits ought to generally invest more, I'd personally say that organizations need to evaluate how they are investing in technological know-how. Is technology a clear component of the organization's budget (or possibly is it lumped in with other office supplies online and services)? Is technology allocated for in Polo Ralph Lauren Slim Fit scholarhip proposals? Is technology looked at as part of the organization's annual record or other impact review?
Moss: Extra technology is not always the solution the secret is to make deliberate investments in technology that supports the NPOs approach. NPOs need to do a better job of taking a look at technology as a tool and not as the solution. With the rapid evolution of technology NPOs should be very careful in making capital technology investment strategies and do their best to find virtual solutions that serve precisely the same purpose without the major upfront investment. In a sense more can be a lesser amount of. Proper technology usage would likely effectively multiply the effectiveness of each NPO in Cincinnati. Every dollar raised could deliver incrementally a lot more services Cheap Nike Air Max Online to those who need these. In the social service field we could realize an increase in persons served, in environmental companies it could translate into one more distance of river cleaned, plus in community building we could discover one more block of metropolis restored. Technology is Ralph Lauren Polo Australia the software that can lead to greater performance, and that will translate to greater success.
Q: If I'm a contributor to a local nonprofit, should I be pleased if our money is being spent on engineering? Why or why not?
Keep: Yes! Technology should offer the entire organization and help ensure that Air Max 2014 Review services, programs, communications, and general engagement are as effective and efficient as possible. When charitable contributions are put towards the operating worth of a dynamic database, data checking, or impact evaluation, that is certainly an important donation.
Moss: As a donor you should be informed about the NPO's investments in technology. Your pleasure or displeasure arrive from the kinds of technology they can be investing in andtheirplans to use it.
Q: What is the biggest challenge nonprofits face in regards to their use Buy Air Yeezy Australia of technology?
Moss: I feel the biggest challenge NPOs face will be to stay nimble and agile. NPOs have a tendency to find a strategy and tactics that Nike Air Force Shoes For Sale work and then stick to them doing the same thing year in year out. Technology is constantly evolving along with developing a culture that facilitates innovation and exploration is easily the most challenging and most critical element for NPOs to address. The technology will be useful if theorganizationsare able to use them in the most effective ways possible.
E: What's the biggest take away you would want to leave with people on this matter?
Ward: Everyone in an business is using technology it's 2013, after all. We can no longer take into consideration technology as something that the particular IT director takes care of as being the development staff are the ones with all the database the most, communications staff using the email marketing tools, as well as program staff looking for practical impact data out of their systems. As such, technology needs to be demonstrated in the organizational budget, training should be part of all team positions, and our evaluation of different tools should be considered equally strategic as our applications and initiatives.
Moss: An NPO's comes from aninvestmentinTechnology is dependent on thequalityof technology, they manner it empowers them to undertake their strategy and strategies, and how their culture really encourages their employees and supports to leverage said technology. Organizations that successfullyimplement technology solutions as a rule have great strategies and cultures enabling that success.
