Japan's nuclear crisis goes significantly further than Fukushima
TOKYO (Reuters) On a hillside in northern Japan, wind turbines slice through the cold air, mocking initiatives at a nearby industrial difficult to shore up the way ahead for the demoralized nuclear power market.
The wind power village at Rokkasho has sprung up close to Japan's first nuclear reprocessing plant, a Lego like complex of windowless structures and steel towers, that is supposed to have started up 25 years ago but is only right now nearing completion.
Dogged by chronic technical problems, it is intended to recycle spent nuclear petrol and partly address the glaring weakness in Japan's bid to restore confidence in the industry, destroyed last year when a quake along with tsunami wrecked the Fukushima Daiichi power section to the south, triggering radioactive leaks plus mass evacuations.
But the Rokkasho project wrong in size little, too late, according to an unsafe who say Japan is usually running so short of atomic waste storage that the complete industry risks shutdown yearly two decades unless a solution can be found.
"You don't build a house with no toilet," said Jitsuro Terashima, chief executive of the Japan Research Institute think tank and part of an expert panel advising the nation's government on energy plan after the Fukushima disaster.
"If Japan severely wants to stick to nuclear energy, a second Rokkasho would be needed,Inches he said.
Long term storage connected with highly radioactive waste is a problem present with all nuclear powered nations, including the United States, but specialists say Japan's unstable geology and largely populated terrain mean that its challenges are far bigger.
A Rokkasho plant is due to finally initial in October, barely 21 months after the radioactive clouds from Fukushima sparked the world's worst nuclear crisis in 25 years a crisis exacerbated by the 1,900 tonnes of spent nuclear fuel rods being stashed at the power station if the disaster struck.
As Asia Kamagra Australia approaches the anniversary on the March 11 quake, your nuclear power industry, which will just over a year ago supplied another of its power, is virtually incapacitated. All but two of the country's Fifty-four reactors are offline.
The reactors include steadily been shut down for maintenance, unable to restart until finally they meet new anxiety tests that aim to see whether power stations in the future can easily withstand the kind of terrifying normal force unleashed on Fukushima: a magnitude 9 quake and a wall of water more than 13 metres (30 ft) high.
Effectively, though, the utility bills have to do more than pass anxiety tests; they have to finally tell local governments that the spend problems will be resolved, not necessarily continue to mount up inside electricity plants lined up along the Japanese people coast like radioactive warehouses, subjected to the risk of tsunamis.
At Fukushima, where highly radioactive spent fuel rods had been crammed mostly into swimming pools of water inside the complex, the actual disaster knocked out the air conditioning and led to a fire with the pools. At the time, it was a more substantial concern than even the potential for a reactor meltdown.
The governor of Ehime prefecture, Tokihiro Nakamura, who supports nuclear power provided that safety is ensured, claims it is time to finally tackle your waste issue, including the choice of not only reprocessing but storing it deep underground.
He places blame on successive national governments pertaining to failing to take the hard options.
"It's a traditional theme," he explained. "It's a history of their fleeing with the risk of losing an selection."Rokkasho would consume 80 percent connected with Japan's spent fuel, assuming Tokyo decides to return to pre disaster levels of nuclear power generating.
But the waste problem is at this point so acute that gurus say the facility will only buy Japan an additional five so that you can 10 years before it has to employ more lasting but politically hypersensitive solutions, such as permanent burial.
If Japan fails to take action to its waste fuel trouble, the entire nuclear power business could one day grind to a halt.
"Even if the Rokkasho plant will become operational, we cannot help however meet the deadline (for hard drive to run out) in Fifteen to twenty years, just a little longer than with regards to 10 years without it," reported Hideyuki Ban, co director of the Citizens' Nuclear Information Center as well as a member of a government section studying the nuclear fuel circuit.
"We think there is an 80 to be able to 90 percent chance of the plant being a failure," he offers.
Rokkasho's record is not encouraging.
Quite a few experts expect further setbacks there, pointing to permanent problems at its kiln, an important part of the plant that deals with advanced, liquid radioactive waste that cannot be re-cycled into fuel. The kiln spins waste into glass, an even more stable substance that is and then intended to be stored underground.
Your plant's operator, Japan Nuclear Gasoline Ltd (JNFL), has had to make many minor design changes on the kiln, which is larger than industry typical kilns developed and used in England. JNFL had opted for a larger kiln to cut costs.
Ultimately though, even if Rokkasho becomes up and running, two problems stay: it alone cannot reuse enough fuel to stop your waste mounting up, and there is even now the issue of burying the vitrified spend permanently in a crowded, earth quake prone country.
"When the (protection and political) conditions are fulfilled and some reactors are restarted . most people still have another high problem to clear. That is storage connected with spent fuel running out,Inch said Ryutaro Kono, chief economist at BNP Paribas Stock and also a member of the government advisory panel.
With the aim of recycling extra spent fuel, Japan had planned to separate plutonium at the Rokkasho reprocessing plant and combine it with uranium to produce merged oxide (MOX) fuel. JNFL plans to build a MOX energy resource facility close to the reprocessing plant, by using a scheduled launch date regarding 2016.
This would in turn lessen the requirement of imported uranium.
But this idea, together with Japan's entire energy policy, will be under review after the disaster at Fukushima. The ruined station had used MOX fuel, which often raised grave concerns for human health because of the existence of dangerous plutonium isotopes.
[/url]
[url=http://www.52huzhu.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=1930565]
though strictly speaking 53
[/url]
[url=http://bbs.wankr.com.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=831376] |
